States / Maryland
State rental intelligence

Maryland rental market data

A source-traced view across 7 metro markets and 24 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

6/7 metros scored24/24 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro45.5out of 100 · 6 measured metros
Maryland identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$395kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,928monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield5.9%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.2%trailing 12-month metro employment
State research brief

Rents are outpacing home values even as measured jobs and migration soften, making Maryland a market for income, liquidity and locality-level screening rather than a uniform growth thesis.

Updated 2026-07-31 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Across Maryland's measured coverage, metro asking-rent growth has a 2.7% median versus 1.5% median home-value growth, with the supplied rent-minus-price gap at 1.2 percentage points. That income signal is paired with a -0.2% median metro job-growth rate and net migration of -13,658 people, so rent momentum does not stand alone as evidence of broad demand strength.

The counter-signal is meaningful: county five-year home-price appreciation has a 44.4% median, and Easton, Philadelphia and Cambridge each show positive job growth. The packet still has important limits: metro rent growth covers 6 of 7 metros, county rent growth covers 19 of 24 counties, vacancy is not the same as available rental inventory, and FEMA loss ratios do not establish parcel-level exposure.

01

Metro rent growth has a 2.7% median versus 1.5% home-value growth, with a supplied 1.2-percentage-point gap → test rent durability and expense coverage instead of assuming appreciation will carry returns.

02

Metro job growth has a -0.2% median and county net migration is -13,658, or -2.2 per 1,000 residents → stress-test tenant demand and lease-up assumptions.

03

County rent burden has a 49.4% median and ranges from 45.9% to 55.6% → examine property-level tenant income and rent-collection sensitivity.

04

Metro months of supply has a 4.5-month median, median days on market is 52 and price drops have a 28.4% median → underwrite resale timing and negotiation room.

05

County investor share ranges from 4.7% to 12.2% across 24 counties, while the packet's selected evidence shows concentration in Baltimore city → compare acquisition competition locally rather than applying a statewide participation assumption.

01
Price and rent momentum

Rent growth is running ahead of value growth across the measured metros

Across 7 measured metros, median home-value growth was 1.5% year over year while median rent growth was 2.7%. The supplied rent-minus-price measure is 1.2 percentage points. Rent growth exceeded price growth in Philadelphia, PA, Cumberland, MD and Hagerstown, MD: 3.8% versus 2.5%, 3.6% versus 3.2%, and 3.0% versus 2.7%, respectively.

For screening, that separation supports testing current rent support and gross yield before relying on appreciation. The three named metro examples have gross yields from 5.9% to 7.0%, but those figures do not establish net returns after financing, vacancy, operating costs, taxes or insurance.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Employment and household movement

Negative statewide movement offsets several local employment positives

Metro job growth has a -0.2% median across 7 measured metros, ranging from -2.3% to 0.5%. County migration totals also point outward: 170,343 moved in versus 184,001 moved out, producing net migration of -13,658 and -2.2 people per 1,000 residents across the measured state population.

The counter-signal is that Easton, MD, Philadelphia, PA and Cambridge, MD recorded positive job growth of 0.7%, 0.3% and 0.3%. Aggregate inbound AGI also exceeded outbound AGI by $68,871. Because the AGI figure is an aggregate total rather than a household-level distribution, it is a reason to examine tenant and employer mix locally, not proof of broad demand strength.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Tenant stress is high while county vacancy varies sharply

Across 24 counties, the median vacancy rate is 8.0%, with a 3.8% to 21.9% range. The median renter share is 26.9%, while 49.4% of renter households are rent-burdened at 30% or more of income; that burden ranges from 45.9% to 55.6%. County median gross rent is $1,402 across 24 measured counties.

Kent County, Dorchester County and Caroline County show rent-burden shares of 59.6%, 56.0% and 55.8%, with vacancy rates of 18.0%, 17.6% and 7.7%. By contrast, vacancy reaches 57.6% in Worcester County, 32.5% in Garrett County and 23.6% in Somerset County. Those vacancy figures should not be treated as available rental supply without property-level confirmation; the packet does not identify how much vacant stock is offered for rent.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

04
Supply and resale conditions

Resale conditions show meaningful negotiation and exit friction

Among 5 metros with months-of-supply data, the median is 4.5 months, ranging from 2.7 to 5.8. Median days on market is 52 across 5 measured metros, with a 34.8-day to 61.2-day range. Price drops have a 28.4% median across 5 metros, ranging from 24.1% to 30.8%.

Local examples reinforce the dispersion: Easton, MD has 4.5 months of supply, 66 median days on market and 28.4% price drops; Cambridge, MD has 6.4 months, 54 days and 30.7%; Cumberland, MD has 4.8 months, 52 days and 24.8%. Their sale-to-list ratios are 97.6%, 97.1% and 99.1%, respectively. Screening should allow for slower resale and price negotiation rather than treating rent momentum as a proxy for exit liquidity.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
County market dispersion

Long-run appreciation is broad, but county listings still move slowly

County FHFA home-price appreciation over 5 years has a 44.4% median across all 24 counties, with a range from 37.8% to 58.8%. Current county appreciation is more moderate at a 3.0% median, ranging from 1.4% to 6.0%. County rent growth has a 2.4% median across 19 measured counties, but the rent-growth coverage is incomplete.

Worcester County combines 62.4% five-year appreciation with a 2.6% current annual rate, while Dorchester County shows 59.0% five-year appreciation and a 2.8% current rate. Listing friction remains visible in Somerset County, Worcester County and Kent County, where median days on market are 75, 68 and 67. Past appreciation is a counter-signal to weak current demand readings, but it cannot establish future appreciation or a net investment return.

Evidence: FHFA House Price Index — annual county appreciation · Realtor.com Economic Research — county listing inventory · Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rents

06
Physical risk and property tax

Hazard labels are statewide, while tax and loss burdens differ by county

Across the 24 measured counties, the mutually exclusive leading-hazard labels are inland flood in 19 counties, hurricane in 3 and coastal flood in 2. The county climate-loss-ratio median is 0.07%, with a 0.06% to 0.13% range. The median effective property-tax rate is 0.90%, and the median tax is $3,389.

County examples show why these costs belong in property screening. Somerset County has a 0.27% climate-loss ratio, a 0.92% property-tax rate and a $1,591 median tax; Dorchester County has 0.17%, 0.94% and $2,456; Worcester County has 0.13%, 0.73% and $2,738. Baltimore city and Howard County show higher property-tax rates of 1.46% and 1.17%, with median taxes of $3,354 and $6,987. FEMA labels and loss ratios are county-level risk indicators, not parcel-level exposure, actual losses or insurance quotes.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

Evidence selected for Maryland

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-0.2%1.5%2.9%Asking-rent change-0.0%2.7%3.7%Rent minus price1.2%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-2.3%-0.2%0.5%Net migration / 1k-2.2Net household movement-13,658
Housing stock and tenant conditionsWhat kind of housing exists, how much is vacant and how burdened are renters?
10th pct.median90th pct.Vacancy rate3.8%8.0%21.9%Renter share17.3%26.9%36.8%Rent burden 30%+45.9%49.4%55.6%Single-family share65.4%80.4%88.9%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution6 scored metros · median 45.5
00–19120–39540–59060–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
83%20/24Rent100%24/24Climate100%24/24Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Cambridge7.6%Cumberland7.0%Philadelphia5.9%Hagerstown5.9%Baltimore5.7%Easton5.6%Washington5.0%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Maryland

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Philadelphia, PA59$395k$1,9285.9%▲ 0.3%
2Hagerstown, MD49$329k$1,6015.9%▼ 0.2%
3Baltimore, MD47$408k$1,9365.7%▼ 1.2%
4Cumberland, MD44$173k$1,0117.0%▼ 2.3%
5Easton, MD41$498k$2,3105.6%▲ 0.7%
6Washington, DC29$585k$2,4485.0%▼ 2.3%

Showing the top 6 scored metros of 7. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Maryland

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Montgomery County, MD1,065,949$627k$2,3464.5%inland flooding
Prince George's County, MD959,754$434k$1,9515.4%inland flooding
Baltimore County, MD850,796$368k$1,7285.6%inland flooding
Anne Arundel County, MD598,166$514k$2,3705.5%inland flooding
Baltimore city, MD573,243$189k$1,80111.4%inland flooding
Howard County, MD336,328$644k$2,3994.5%inland flooding
Frederick County, MD287,048$509k$2,2175.2%inland flooding
Harford County, MD263,757$425k$1,8975.3%inland flooding
Carroll County, MD175,321$500k$1,8264.4%inland flooding
Charles County, MD170,527$454k$2,3286.2%inland flooding
Washington County, MD155,709$335k$1,4445.2%inland flooding
St. Mary's County, MD115,126$440k$1,8725.1%inland flooding
County yield sample20/24counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−13,658IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share7.0%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Sources used in this analysis

Measured releases, not a global source count

Only sources supporting the selected evidence modules are listed here.

Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Metro rent-growth coverage is incomplete: the packet reports 6 measured rent-growth records versus 7 home-value-growth records, so the rent median does not cover every measured metro.
  2. The negative migration and job figures are aggregate or metro-level measures, while the positive AGI gap is an aggregate total; neither establishes property-level tenant demand or household purchasing power.
  3. County vacancy ranges from 3.8% to 21.9% and may include units not offered for rent, so vacancy cannot substitute for a rental-inventory or lease-up analysis.
  4. The five-year county appreciation median of 44.4% is backward-looking and does not establish future appreciation, resale proceeds or net returns.
  5. FEMA leading-hazard labels and climate-loss ratios are county-level modeled indicators; they do not establish parcel-level exposure, insurance premiums or actual property losses.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Does the rent-growth signal cover every measured metro?

No. The packet reports 7 metro home-value-growth records but only 6 metro rent-growth records, so the 2.7% rent-growth median excludes one measured metro.

What is the strongest demand counter-signal?

Easton, MD, Philadelphia, PA and Cambridge, MD show positive job growth of 0.7%, 0.3% and 0.3%, and aggregate inbound AGI exceeds outbound AGI by $68,871 despite net migration of -13,658.

Can county vacancy be used as a direct measure of rental supply?

No. County vacancy ranges from 3.8% to 21.9%, and the packet does not identify how much vacant stock is available for rent. Worcester County's 57.6% vacancy rate illustrates why property-level verification is needed.

How should the hazard data affect property screening?

Use the county's leading-hazard label and climate-loss ratio as a triage step, then verify the specific parcel, insurance terms and mitigation conditions. The packet records inland flood as the leading label in 19 counties, hurricane in 3 and coastal flood in 2.

Is market participation or competition uniform across the state?

The selected investor-activity evidence indicates dispersion: county investor share ranges from 4.7% to 12.2% across 24 counties, so acquisition competition should be evaluated locally rather than treated as a statewide constant.